Johnson County Council to consider vehicle excise, wheel tax increase

Nobody likes a tax enhance, but the Johnson County Council is leaving all solutions on the desk to fund $390 million in road get the job done about the subsequent five yrs.

At their Monday meeting council associates talked about a potential maximize of the county’s wheel tax and automobile excise tax.

The automobile excise and wheel tax are taxes charged on license plates. The motor vehicle excise tax is billed for autos, trucks, motorcycles and modest trailers, even though the wheel tax is billed for big automobiles like dump trucks, semis and buses.

The county to start with set up this tax in 2008 and it is up for another renewal this 12 months, as the tax is set up to sunset following 60 months until the council can take motion to renew it.

The vehicle taxes ended up initially on the council’s funds as a basic renewal. The ordinance right before the council had one particular adjust – a reclassification of tiny trailers to be billed under the automobile excise tax fairly than wheel tax.

Presented the county’s highway funding desires, a number of council members stated they would like the highway division to current them an option to raise the tax. That is achievable since a point out law handed in 2017 makes it possible for counties to increase the tax fees to double the prior most fee, which was $40.

Luke Mastin, the county’s highway supervisor, did not originally present an boost for the reason that the tax has been unpopular in the earlier.

“I now have no dilemma with elevating the costs, but the issue that we’ve experienced with this income source is that it is a rather regressive tax. It has the probable to hurt individuals that are underneath the median common money,” Mastin claimed. “I will acquire as substantially revenue as you’re willing to offer but this hasn’t been a popular income source. However, it is the only nearby statutory income resource we have.”

The county’s taxes are stacked on top rated of the state’s automobile taxes, which commonly will make up the much larger portion of annual registration costs. The county presently rates $7.50 for motorcycles, $15 for trailers, $25 for cars and trucks and $40 for huge vehicles.

In accordance to knowledge complied by the freeway section, county inhabitants paid out $4.24 million in motor vehicle taxes in 2021. Of that, $1.78 million was distributed to the county.

If the county doubled the charges, that would double the funds for streets. Several council customers reported that is anything the county has to contemplate, particularly when the future most effective selection is increasing earnings taxes.

“I agree it (boosting the taxes) could disproportionately have an impact on some, but it looks like it, form of, is the alternative to some of what we are facing,” mentioned Rob Henderson, county council member. “Not in lieu of an EDIT (money) tax but in lieu of a larger charge. This is a lot more of a consumer price due to the fact you are employing the roadways.”

Nevertheless, other council users were opposed to the concept of boosting the tax.

Council member James Ison expressed fears with the plan of stacking new taxes. He explained he would alternatively see the county raise profits taxes, when leaving automobile taxes by itself.

“I aid an EDIT but I believe we require to prioritize. We are struggling with the steepest inflation we have faced in three many years. As Mike Reuter (the county’s financial marketing consultant) stated we are brinking on yet another recession,” Ison claimed. “I really do not feel it is good for us to try out to make up for all of this at at the time on the back of taxpayers who are hurting.”

Council member John Myers explained the tax would disproportionately influence seniors, who he speculates use county roadways a lot less than some others.

“My considering is that there are seniors out there who travel quite tiny on our roadways who we would be doubling what they spend (to the county) to travel their auto,” Myers claimed. “I sense like this is not a fair tax to them.”

Prior to creating a final decision, council users say they require additional info. They want to know who an enhance would have an impact on the most, so consensus was presented for Mastin to appear into the demographics of county residents who fork out the taxes. The council also asked Mastin to look at how the county would stack up to other folks if the tax was doubled or increased.

The council will require to choose some motion later this yr on the auto taxes, regardless of whether to raise them or hold them the same. Council users voted unanimously to renew the car tax ordinance on first reading through.

The council may still increase the taxes if they pick to edit the ordinance just before the next reading through. Mastin reported the council need to target their September assembly for the next reading to have the fee in position for up coming 12 months.

The council also talked about other techniques to make up the road funding shortfall. Those people include an revenue tax increase and repurposing tax profits gathered by the public properly nearby cash flow tax that was authorized to fund the county jail growth. These are both equally suggestions that have been imagined in previous conferences of the council on highway funding.

Henderson presented eventualities that would require going fifty percent of the county’s jail expenses to the standard fund and relocating all of the jail expenditures to the typical fund. In the two scenarios, the county would continue to absence the funding it requirements for immediate street requires, these kinds of as the planned reconstruction of Smith Valley Highway at the long term Interstate 69 corridor. Henderson reported the funding for that undertaking probably wouldn’t be accessible until finally 2029.

Council users also debated the deserves of using any or all of the jail tax raise to fund streets, presented that the tax was lifted for felony justice fees. For illustration, the tax raise could fund the jail and a community corrections or psychological overall health facility in the foreseeable future if the county does not repurpose it for roadways.

The Every day Journal asked for to see figures hooked up to the scenarios, but Shena Johnson, the county’s attorney, explained the documents could not be disclosed mainly because they are deliberative elements.

No precise information about how much the income tax improve would be if it were being to be accredited was produced out there at the conference.